<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WP 2.3.3 does not close injection spam loophole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/</link>
	<description>blogging about blogging about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottS-M</title>
		<link>http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottS-M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Cookie hijacking is different than they were using before wasn&#039;t it? Funny they&#039;d go through the trouble of getting that and then fall back to the same sort of spam as before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookie hijacking is different than they were using before wasn&#8217;t it? Funny they&#8217;d go through the trouble of getting that and then fall back to the same sort of spam as before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aziz Poonawalla</title>
		<link>http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Aziz Poonawalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I upgraded that blog the day of the 2.3.3 release, because I&#039;d been hit before. So merely upgrading the blog doesn&#039;t remove the vulnerability?

I am going ahead and changing the passwords. Thats probably best practice anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded that blog the day of the 2.3.3 release, because I&#8217;d been hit before. So merely upgrading the blog doesn&#8217;t remove the vulnerability?</p>
<p>I am going ahead and changing the passwords. Thats probably best practice anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metablog.us/blogging/wp-233-does-not-close-injection-spam-loophole/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I think your blog was probably attacked before you upgraded and the hackers got your login cookie using some Javascript. Best thing to do is change your password!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your blog was probably attacked before you upgraded and the hackers got your login cookie using some Javascript. Best thing to do is change your password!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
